<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:feed:solutions</id>
  <title>Christian T. Macion — Solutions</title>
  <subtitle>Client engagements and shipped deliverables. Newest first.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/feed-solutions.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" />
  <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
  <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Christian T. Macion</name>
    <email>christianmacion26@gmail.com</email>
    <uri>https://christianmacion26.github.io/</uri>
  </author>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:11-agent-eval-platform</id>
    <title>11-Agent Eval-First Research Platform</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#11-agent-eval-platform" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">A small systematic-trading desk needed an AI workflow that could keep pace with the research pipeline
*without* shipping hallucinated or unverifiable analysis. The naive path — a single agent with one
prompt — produced plausible but unfalsifiable outputs. The desk needed something closer to a research
organization than a chatbot.
</summary>
    <category term="multi-agent" />
    <category term="eval-harness" />
    <category term="MCP" />
    <category term="model-routing" />
    <category term="walk-forward" />
    <category term="deflated-sharpe" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:7-agent-venture-pipeline</id>
    <title>7-Agent Venture Incubation Pipeline</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#7-agent-venture-pipeline" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">An operator-led venture incubation arm needed a repeatable way to triage, brief, and ledger new
business ideas — without one human bottleneck, and without the agent that proposes a decision
being the same one that approves it.
</summary>
    <category term="multi-agent" />
    <category term="governance" />
    <category term="venture" />
    <category term="prompts" />
    <category term="separation-of-duties" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:8-agent-editorial-pipeline</id>
    <title>8-Agent Editorial Production Pipeline (SLOP ↓ 96%)</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#8-agent-editorial-pipeline" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">A high-volume editorial workflow was generating content with a measurable &quot;slop index&quot; — generic,
templated, easily-detected text. Quality gate was after-the-fact and manual. Production scaled
faster than the editorial team could review.
</summary>
    <category term="multi-agent" />
    <category term="content" />
    <category term="eval-gate" />
    <category term="slop-scanner" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:9-project-quant-library</id>
    <title>9-Project Public-Data Quant Research Library</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#9-project-quant-library" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Most online quant research demos are not reproducible: closed datasets, undisclosed parameters,
un-reported multiple-testing bias, and no OOS discipline. A hiring-grade research portfolio
needs every one of those addressed explicitly.
</summary>
    <category term="deflated-sharpe" />
    <category term="PBO" />
    <category term="CSCV" />
    <category term="walk-forward" />
    <category term="block-bootstrap" />
    <category term="multiple-testing" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:crypto-stat-arb-funding</id>
    <title>Crypto Statistical-Arbitrage Pipeline with Funding-Carry</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#crypto-stat-arb-funding" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Crypto perps run funding payments every 8h. A naive long-short book ignores funding carry and
bleeds slowly when the spread is inverted. A working stat-arb needs the funding cost added back
to P&amp;L *before* sizing.
</summary>
    <category term="crypto" />
    <category term="stat-arb" />
    <category term="funding-carry" />
    <category term="cointegration" />
    <category term="half-life" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:cta-curriculum-public</id>
    <title>Public Finance Curriculum (CTA-Track, Self-Directed)</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#cta-curriculum-public" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">The Philippines has limited access to rigorous CTA-grade technical analysis training. Most
curriculum is either imported (US/UK, expensive) or shallow (TA-by-rote). There&apos;s a gap for
affordable, rigorous, evidence-based technical analysis education.
</summary>
    <category term="education" />
    <category term="STA" />
    <category term="CTA" />
    <category term="public-curriculum" />
    <category term="open-source" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:deflated-sharpe-gate</id>
    <title>Deflated Sharpe Ratio as a Built-in Pipeline Gate</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#deflated-sharpe-gate" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Naive Sharpe ratios ignore the search effort — if you try 100 variants of an idea, the
best-looking one will overstate the true edge. The desk needed this multiple-testing
correction built into the validation pipeline, not stapled on at the end.
</summary>
    <category term="deflated-sharpe" />
    <category term="PBO" />
    <category term="MinBTL" />
    <category term="multiple-testing" />
    <category term="scipy-free" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:eval-mcp-server</id>
    <title>Eval MCP Server — 31 Gates as First-Class Tools</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#eval-mcp-server" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">LLM eval harnesses live in code or in spreadsheets — neither is a clean integration target for
multi-agent pipelines. A multi-agent system needs the eval gates exposed as **tools**, not as
Python imports.
</summary>
    <category term="MCP" />
    <category term="eval-harness" />
    <category term="multi-agent" />
    <category term="contract-first" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:lookahead-bias-audit</id>
    <title>Look-Ahead-Bias Audit Suite</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#lookahead-bias-audit" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Look-ahead bias is silent: a backtest that uses future data looks great until you deploy it.
A serious research portfolio needs an **explicit audit suite** — a checklist of failure modes
with mechanical tests.
</summary>
    <category term="lookahead-bias" />
    <category term="point-in-time" />
    <category term="survivorship" />
    <category term="frozen-spec" />
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:christianmacion26.github.io,2026:solution:txn-cost-aware-backtest</id>
    <title>Transaction-Cost-Aware Backtest Engine</title>
    <link href="https://christianmacion26.github.io/solutions/#txn-cost-aware-backtest" rel="alternate" type="text/html" />
    <updated>2026-07-09T18:12:54.545Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Backtests that ignore transaction costs, slippage, and latency are the most common source of
overfit research. A backtest engine needs all three treated as first-class inputs, not as
after-the-fact deductions.
</summary>
    <category term="txn-costs" />
    <category term="slippage" />
    <category term="capacity" />
    <category term="walk-forward" />
  </entry>
</feed>
